nanog mailing list archives
Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter
From: "Andrew - Supernews" <andrew () supernews net>
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 23:30:03 +0100
"Forrest" == Forrest <forrest () almighty c64 org> writes:
Forrest> Sure, this would fail if a network decided to only announce
Forrest> /24's for example without a larger aggregate, but how many
Forrest> networks are really doing that?
More than you probably imagine.
Consider the following table:
asn | count | c24 | c23
----------+-------+------+-----
9583 | 1100 | 1014 | 42
7018 | 1140 | 764 | 125
17488 | 560 | 557 | 0
19916 | 568 | 532 | 6
701 | 729 | 501 | 38
1221 | 474 | 380 | 14
1239 | 572 | 359 | 24
577 | 417 | 337 | 19
209 | 587 | 329 | 38
17557 | 291 | 270 | 1
10292 | 270 | 267 | 2
4802 | 345 | 259 | 25
6140 | 315 | 243 | 16
4323 | 483 | 242 | 12
7474 | 284 | 228 | 8
2386 | 295 | 218 | 9
3301 | 307 | 217 | 30
702 | 392 | 206 | 34
6746 | 279 | 200 | 41
In this, "count" is the number of prefixes originated by the AS that
are not covered by any longer prefix (without regard to origin); "c24"
is the number of those prefixes which are /24s; "c23" is the number
which are /23s. I've cut this table off at 200 - the total number of
uncovered /24 routes across all ASes is 51811.
Some of the above numbers would be worse if not for the presence of
over-large route announcements from other providers (for example,
Chinanet announce 125.96.0.0/14 even though 125.99.0.0/16 belongs
to hathway.net in India (AS 17488); approximately 230 _more_ /24
routes announced by Hathway are in this range).
--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com
Current thread:
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter, (continued)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Adrian Chadd (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Joe Provo (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Stephen Sprunk (Sep 10)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter bmanning (Sep 11)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Nathan Ward (Sep 08)
- Forward for filtering, was: Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 23)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Bradley Urberg Carlson (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Forrest (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Russ White (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Forrest (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Andrew - Supernews (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Forrest (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Joe Provo (Sep 09)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Forrest (Sep 09)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Stephen Sprunk (Sep 10)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Kevin Loch (Sep 10)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Stephen Sprunk (Sep 10)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Kevin Blackham (Sep 10)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Jon Lewis (Sep 11)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Adrian Chadd (Sep 11)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Russ White (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Andrew - Supernews (Sep 08)
