nanog mailing list archives
Re: hosted PBX/VOIP thru VPN?
From: Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:01:19 +1300
On 13/11/2008, at 12:39 AM, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
Because the broadband connection was so fast, TCP was able to repair the impairments without reducing voice quality. "
That works fine if latency+window size is low, so that segments are retransmitted quickly.
You really should also do the math and factor in the latency that comes from doing something like this, assuming you lose a packet. G. 114 recommends an end to end latency of no more than 150ms for voice applications, where over 400ms is unacceptable (between 150 and 400 you should indicate that performance is not ideal).
Finally, some audio codecs work well with fairly high amounts of loss - I'd recommend doing something like that first. iLBC does this really well. G.729 etc. do not - they rely on context, so a single packet lost results in several packets of lost audio (and so, silence). iLBC doesn't rely on context, and quality degrades during packet loss before you get silence.
The i stands for Internet - so no surprise it works great in typical Internet conditions.
-- Nathan Ward
Current thread:
- hosted PBX/VOIP thru VPN? Lorell Hathcock (Nov 11)
- Re: hosted PBX/VOIP thru VPN? Nathan Ward (Nov 11)
- RE: hosted PBX/VOIP thru VPN? Tim Sanderson (Nov 11)
- Re: hosted PBX/VOIP thru VPN? John Todd (Nov 11)
- Re: hosted PBX/VOIP thru VPN? Aaron Wolfe (Nov 12)
- Re: hosted PBX/VOIP thru VPN? Nathan Ward (Nov 12)
- RE: hosted PBX/VOIP thru VPN? Frank Bulk (Nov 15)
- Re: hosted PBX/VOIP thru VPN? Nathan Ward (Nov 12)
- Re: hosted PBX/VOIP thru VPN? Frank Yocum (Nov 12)
