nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 routing /48s
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:17:19 +0000
Robert.E.VanOrmer () frb gov wrote:
Are there any parties out there routing /48 IPv6 networks globally? I ran into a supposed Catch-22 with Verizon and IPv6 address space and was looking for clarification.
There are a bunch of IXPs around who have been announcing /48s for a some while. From a cursory glance around, it looks like Verizon is unreachable from these at least AS2128, which announces a single /48. This would seem to support your sales person's claim. It will be interesting to see how long this policy lasts - or at least it will be interesting to see at what stage carriers decide that the loss in sales revenues hurts more than the cost of carrying /48s from PI delegatin blocks. Nick
Current thread:
- IPv6 routing /48s Robert . E . VanOrmer (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Mark Tinka (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Nick Hilliard (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Kevin Oberman (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Michael Sinatra (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Joe Abley (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Owen DeLong (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Frank Habicht (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Owen DeLong (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Nathan Ward (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Joe Maimon (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Christopher Morrow (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Michael Sinatra (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Joel Jaeggli (Nov 18)
