nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cisco uRPF failures
From: "Tom Zingale (tomz)" <tomz () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:31:39 -0700
The 3560E/3750E support uRPF as per docs: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750e_3560e/softwar e/release/12.2_46_se/configuration/guide/swiprout.html#wp1388196 The unsupported command guide looks in error.
-----Original Message----- From: Brandon Ewing [mailto:nicotine () warningg com] Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 11:26 AM To: nanog () nanog org; saku+nanog () ytti fi Subject: Re: Cisco uRPF failures On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 08:11:28PM +0300, Saku Ytti wrote:Sound like these shops are using 3550 as router, which is common for smaller shops, especially in EU. And indeed, 3550 would not do uRPF. (3560E does).Are you sure? According to the IOS guide for 3560E/3750E, "ip verify" is still an unsupported interface command. I don't have a 3560E handy to test on, but I know that a non-E 3560 refuses it with a notice regarding
how
verification is not supported by hardware. http://tinyurl.com/5qbqzb -- Brandon
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures, (continued)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Anton Kapela (Sep 06)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Christopher Morrow (Sep 06)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Jo Rhett (Sep 11)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Sam Stickland (Sep 07)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Saku Ytti (Sep 08)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Jo Rhett (Sep 11)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Saku Ytti (Sep 11)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Jo Rhett (Sep 11)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Brandon Ewing (Sep 13)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Saku Ytti (Sep 13)
- RE: Cisco uRPF failures Tom Zingale (tomz) (Sep 15)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Brian Feeny (Sep 03)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Paul Wall (Sep 04)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Mark Tinka (Sep 04)
- uRPF Jo Rhett (Sep 04)
- Re: uRPF Mark Tinka (Sep 04)
