nanog mailing list archives

Re: IXP - PNI


From: Antonio Querubin <tony () lava net>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:44:48 -1000 (HST)

On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:

the vlan tagging idea is a virtualization of the PNI construct.
why use an IX when running 10's/100's/1000's of private network
interconnects will do?


granted, if out of the 120 ASN's at an IX, 100 are exchanging on
average - 80KBs - then its likley safe to dump them all into a single
physical port and vlan tag the heck out of it.

its those other 20 that demand some special care.

The construct also doesn't scale well for multicast traffic exchange if there's a significant number of multicast peers even though the traffic might be low for individual source ASNs. On the other hand, if the IXP doesn't use IGMP/MLD snooping capable switches, then I suppose it doesn't matter.

Antonio Querubin
whois:  AQ7-ARIN


Current thread: