
nanog mailing list archives
Re: IXP
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:31:39 +0800
On Apr 19, 2009, at 5:12 AM, Paul Vixie wrote:
many colo facilities now use one customer per vlan due to this concern?
Haven't most major vendors for years offered features in their switches which mitigate ARP-spoofing, provide per-port layer-2 isolation on a sub-VLAN basis, as well as implementing layer-3 anti- spoofing on a per-switchport basis (i.e., BCP38 on a per-switchport basis)?
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com> // +852.9133.2844 mobile Our dreams are still big; it's just the future that got small. -- Jason Scott
Current thread:
- Re: IXP, (continued)
- Re: IXP Roland Dobbins (Apr 18)
- Re: IXP Sean Donelan (Apr 19)
- Re: IXP Stephen Stuart (Apr 18)
- Re: IXP Bill Woodcock (Apr 18)
- Re: IXP Paul Vixie (Apr 23)
- Re: IXP Leo Bicknell (Apr 23)
- Re: IXP Adrian Chadd (Apr 23)
- Re: IXP Jack Bates (Apr 23)
- Re: IXP Mike Leber (Apr 23)
- Re: IXP Stephen Stuart (Apr 24)
- Re: IXP Leo Bicknell (Apr 24)