nanog mailing list archives
Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"]
From: Jo Rhett <jrhett () netconsonance com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:55:23 -0700
On Apr 21, 2009, at 2:42 PM, Shane Ronan wrote:
Mr Curran, given the response you've seen from the group, and in particular the argument that most CEO's or Officers of firms will simply sign off on what they IT staff tells them (as they have little to no understanding of the situation),
You really should go ask a CEO if he'd sign off on something that he doesn't understand. Really. I can assure you that your impression is wrong, and most CEOs don't prefer to be standing in court defending their actions.
can you explain what exactly you are hoping to achieve by heaping on yet an additional requirement to the already over burdensome process of receiving an IPv4 allocation?
Burdensome? Really? If you have your documentation together it takes about 15 minutes from beginning of the application form until receiving your new allocation. I spend longer on hold any time I deal with any other vendor.
-- Jo RhettNet Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness
Current thread:
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"], (continued)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Chris Owen (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Roger Marquis (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Owen DeLong (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Fred Baker (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Roger Marquis (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Kevin Loch (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Brandon Galbraith (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Mark Newton (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Michael Dillon (Apr 24)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Brett Frankenberger (Apr 25)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Martin Hannigan (Apr 25)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Chris Owen (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Owen DeLong (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Owen DeLong (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- NAT64/NAT-PT update in IETF, was: Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 22)
