nanog mailing list archives
Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:39:57 -0400
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:57:31 -0400, Matthew Palmer <mpalmer () hezmatt org> wrote:
FTP? Who uses FTP these days?
...
A depressingly large number of people use FTP. Attempts to move them ontosomething less insane are fruitless. Even when the tools support it (and plenty of "web design" tools don't appear to do anything other than FTP), "we've always done it that way and it works fine and if we have to change something we'll move to another hosting company rather than click a different button in our program".
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:07:08 -0400, Daniel Senie <dts () senie com> wrote:
You are out of touch. FTP is used by nearly EVERY web hosting provider for updates of web sites. Anonymous FTP is not used.
These are not random, anonymous ftp connections. These are people who login with a username and password, and are therefore, identifiable; and even then, it's for access to manage their own site. A single IP address pointing to a single server (or farm of servers) will, and DOES, work just fine. I know, because I've done it for ~15 years.
When I ask "who", I'm asking about a paid for, external service -- just like web hosting. No one calls up 1-800-Host-My-Crap and asks for "an FTP server".
Bottom line... if your justification for a /19 is "FTP servers", you are fully justified in laughing at them as you hang up the phone.
Current thread:
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests, (continued)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Chris Adams (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Ken A (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Matthew Palmer (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 23)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Ricky Beam (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Ken A (Apr 22)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Ricky Beam (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Matthew Palmer (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Ricky Beam (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Lionel Elie Mamane (Apr 24)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Chris Adams (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests bmanning (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Joe Abley (Apr 22)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests bmanning (Apr 22)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests bmanning (Apr 22)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Joe Greco (Apr 22)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Karl Auer (Apr 22)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Joe Abley (Apr 22)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Nathan Ward (Apr 22)
