
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis () neustar biz>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:24:03 -0400
At 18:39 -0500 4/20/09, Joe Greco wrote:
Knowing that blatant lying about IP space justifications has been an ongoing game in the community, ARIN has decided to "do something" about it.
I don't draw that direct conclusion. Although it may sound like "we know you've been lying so we want to hear from your parents" this can be read more benignly as "we want to make sure your parents know what's going on."
And why would the answer be any different, now?
No, but now, if you (the engineer) have been telling non-technical management that there's a need to investigate IPv6 and management has been turning a deaf ear, you now have "backup" - a second source for management to get the message from that they ought to think about IPv6 plans.
PS - this is based upon lessons learned when I worked for a US fed agency. When the network folks said we needed $X thousand of dollars for 10BaseT deployment across the campus we were ignored. When each division asked each directorate and they asked the budget committee for what amounted to $X thousand to have the networks deploy 10BaseT (two years on), we got the job.
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NeuStar You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468 Getting everything you want is easy if you don't want much.
Current thread:
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests, (continued)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Chris Owen (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 23)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Carl Ford (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Rich Kulawiec (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests John Curran (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Joel Jaeggli (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Ricky Beam (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Leo Bicknell (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Kevin Graham (Apr 23)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Edward Lewis (Apr 22)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Roger Marquis (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] John Curran (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Chris Owen (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Roger Marquis (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Owen DeLong (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Fred Baker (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Roger Marquis (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] John Curran (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Kevin Loch (Apr 21)