nanog mailing list archives
Re: F5/Cisco catalyst configuration question
From: Ross Vandegrift <ross () kallisti us>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:25:20 -0400
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:50:45AM -0400, Jeff Kell wrote:
Anyone have "smarter" etherchannels running F5-to-Catalysts ?
Yes, I'm running LACP between SUP-720 6500s and BIG-IP 6900 boxes on
the SFP interfaces. The key was to disable ethernet flow control on
the BIG-IP side. They enable it by default and it really confuses the
Cisco side.
After disabling flow control on the BIG-IP's physical interfaces, LACP
came up just fine.
--
Ross Vandegrift
ross () kallisti us
"If the fight gets hot, the songs get hotter. If the going gets tough,
the songs get tougher."
--Woody Guthrie
Current thread:
- F5/Cisco catalyst configuration question Scott Spencer (Aug 19)
- RE: F5/Cisco catalyst configuration question Christopher Greves (Aug 19)
- Re: F5/Cisco catalyst configuration question Darren Bolding (Aug 19)
- Re: F5/Cisco catalyst configuration question Jeff Kell (Aug 20)
- Re: F5/Cisco catalyst configuration question Ross Vandegrift (Aug 20)
- RE: F5/Cisco catalyst configuration question Scott Spencer (Aug 20)
- RE: F5/Cisco catalyst configuration question Dylan Ebner (Aug 20)
- RE: F5/Cisco catalyst configuration question Chris Lowe (Aug 20)
- Re: F5/Cisco catalyst configuration question Darren Bolding (Aug 19)
- RE: F5/Cisco catalyst configuration question Christopher Greves (Aug 19)
