nanog mailing list archives
Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:15:46 -0500
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:12:22AM -0600, James Hess wrote:
Many sites don't use names that will necessarily be meaningful to an outsider.
Then they should expect issues with mail acceptance by outsiders.
Some sites might want to avoid certain "meaningful" RDNS entries since spammers, hackers, and other abusive users that scan IP ranges can utilize the RDNS to facilitate their activities.
This is nonsense. RDNS/DNS naming choices are a trivial obstacle to spammers et.al. who went over this speed bump at 70 MPH years ago and have been accelerating ever since. This kind of security-by-obscurity tactic is far more likely to draw their attention than evade it, as any site using it has in effect run up a large flag with "we don't understand security basics" written on it and thus made itself an attractive target. ---Rsk
Current thread:
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers, (continued)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 15)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Adam Armstrong (Dec 16)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Mike Lieman (Dec 16)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers William Herrin (Dec 16)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 16)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Jack Bates (Dec 16)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Matthew Petach (Dec 16)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Jack Bates (Dec 16)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 16)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Matthew Petach (Dec 16)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Rich Kulawiec (Dec 16)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Sean Donelan (Dec 16)
