nanog mailing list archives
Re: FTTH Active vs Passive
From: Byron Hicks <bhicks () ots utsystem edu>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:47:50 -0600
4k video feeds (the new High Def): compressed: 1Gb/s uncompressed: 9Gb/s On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:39 PM, JC Dill <jcdill.lists () gmail com> wrote:
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:You don't need to supply more than a gig per household,"640K ought to be enough for anybody. " (oft mis-attributed to Bill Gates) http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Bill_Gates If, 10 years ago (1999) when most internet-connected homes still used dialup, you had suggested that ISPs would be putting in gigabit services to homes, people would have laughed. Yet today, here we are talking about gig feeds. I wonder how much bandwidth homes will be using 10 years from now... jc
-- Byron L. Hicks University of Texas System 512-377-9857 AIM: byronhicks
Current thread:
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Justin Shore (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Dan White (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive JC Dill (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Byron Hicks (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Chris Adams (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Byron Hicks (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Chris Hills (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Dan White (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Michael Holstein (Dec 01)
- RE: FTTH Active vs Passive Deepak Jain (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive James Bensley (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive bmanning (Dec 01)
