nanog mailing list archives
Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure
From: Paul Timmins <paul () telcodata us>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:32:21 -0500
Barry Shein wrote:
Cool. Then you just have to figure out how to unilaterally withdraw a resource that doesn't have a centralized automated verification system. Taking you out of whois doesn't automatically take you out of people's BGP tables, after all.The obvious change RIRs could make would be to make sure the contracts they allocate resources under give them the latitude to cancel those contracts if certain boundaries of behavior are breached. YES I REALIZE EASIER SAID THAN DONE. But just as allocation of resources is not a transfer of ownership to the allocatee by the same reasoning cancellation of that allocation for breach of contract is just a withdrawal of said license, not a "taking".
-Paul
Current thread:
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure, (continued)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure O'Reirdan, Michael (Dec 23)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Jon Lewis (Dec 24)
- RE: Article on spammers and their infrastructure O'Reirdan, Michael (Dec 25)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Rich Kulawiec (Dec 30)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Randy Bush (Dec 30)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Jorge Amodio (Dec 30)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Paul Vixie (Dec 30)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Fred Baker (Dec 30)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Eric Brunner-Williams (Dec 31)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Barry Shein (Dec 31)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Paul Timmins (Dec 31)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure David Conrad (Dec 31)
- RE: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Alex Lanstein (Dec 31)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Jorge Amodio (Dec 31)
