nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cogent input

From: Dan Carley <dan.carley () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:00:05 +0100

2009/6/11 Tore Anderson <tore () linpro no>

And, they have no plans to support IPv6.


I have been promised, in writing, that they will provide us with native
IPv6 transit before the end of the year.

I'm based in Europe, though.  Perhaps they're more flexible and
customer-friendly here than in the US?


We too have been informed Q3/Q4 09, in Europe and NA.

Regards,

Current thread:

Re: Cogent input, (continued)
- - - Re: Cogent input Kevin Hodle (Jun 17)
    - Re: Cogent input L K (Jun 18)
    - Re: Cogent input German Martinez (Jun 14)
    - IPv6 transits (Was: Cogent input) Jeroen Massar (Jun 14)
    - Re: IPv6 transits (Was: Cogent input) Robert Blayzor (Jun 18)
    - Re: IPv6 transits (Was: Cogent input) Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom (Jun 18)
    - Re: IPv6 transits sthaug (Jun 18)
    - Re: IPv6 transits Tomas Caslavsky (Jun 18)
    - Re: Cogent input Justin Shore (Jun 12)
    - Re: Cogent input Seth Mattinen (Jun 16)
    - Re: Cogent input Dan Carley (Jun 17)
  - Re: Cogent input Brad Fleming (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Tore Anderson (Jun 11)
- RE: Cogent input Alex Rubenstein (Jun 11)
  - Re: Cogent input German Martinez (Jun 14)
    - Re: Cogent input Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 15)
- Re: Cogent input Martin Hannigan (Jun 12)
- Re: Cogent input Stef Walter (Jun 15)
  - Hurricane Electric Paul Stewart (Jun 17)
    - Re: Hurricane Electric David Klann (Jun 17)
    - Re: Hurricane Electric Paul Ferguson (Jun 17)

(Thread continues...)