nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds?
From: Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:35:57 -0500
Once upon a time, Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net> said:
I promise you that that is not the case for all applications. Geosynchronous satellites can be anywhere. For the applications you are considering (communications mostly), equatorial orbit is the most advantageous.
Geosynchronous are only over a particular longitude. They move up and down in latitude, so it isn't over a given point except twice per day (or only once at the extremes). -- Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Current thread:
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds?, (continued)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? David Barak (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 02)
- RE: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Deepak Jain (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? David Barak (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Marshall Eubanks (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Michael Holstein (Jun 02)
- RE: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Deepak Jain (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Chris Adams (Jun 02)
- RE: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Deepak Jain (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Chris Adams (Jun 02)
- RE: Fiber cut - response in seconds? John van Oppen (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? David Barak (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Ryan Wilkins (Jun 02)
