nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ?
From: Christian Seitz <seitz () strato-rz de>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:00:04 +0200
Hello, Jay Hennigan wrote:
We're getting cyclops[1] alerts that AS13214 is advertising itself as origin for all of our prefixes. Their anomaly report shows thousands of prefixes originating there. Anyone else seeing evidence of this or being affected?
I have also seen this today for our prefixes where Cyclops reported the as path "48285 13214". After sending an e-mail to both ASN I got the following answer from AS48285: "Our transit 13214 had interesting router problems affecting bgp origins for the entire bgp table. The next-hop and thus routing was still working fine though. Since we collect bgp data from several transits and announce it to multiple route servers and for our own publicly available bgp-tools, it looked worse than it was, but as far as we can tell it was actually never propagated by them to the Internet except to downstreams, where traffic still worked, although via an unusually short path." Regards, Christian Seitz Network Operations
Current thread:
- Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ?, (continued)
- Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ? Jay Hennigan (May 11)
- Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ? Russell Heilling (May 11)
- Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ? Jon Lewis (May 11)
- Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ? David Freedman (May 11)
- Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ? Christopher Morrow (May 11)
- Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ? David Freedman (May 11)
- Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ? bmanning (May 11)
- Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ? Hank Nussbacher (May 11)
- Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ? Christopher Morrow (May 11)
- Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ? Andree Toonk (May 11)
- Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ? Christopher Morrow (May 11)
- Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ? Christian Seitz (May 11)
- Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ? Ricardo Oliveira (May 11)
