nanog mailing list archives
Re: Failover how much complexity will it add?
From: Adam Rothschild <asr+nanog () latency net>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:29:08 -0500
On 2009-11-08-10:23:41, Blake Pfankuch <bpfankuch () cpgreeley com> wrote:
Make sure they operate their own network for last mile
[...]
I wouldn't sway from the big names for your primary connections either.
Because ownership of the provider/subsidiary delivering the last mile means one hand is talking to the other, and you're going to get good service and reliability as a result? And "big names" never have any peering-related spats and always deliver the best possible end-user experience, right? :-) (Some good points further on, though important we don't lead the OP down the wrong path or with a false sense of security there...) -a
Current thread:
- Failover how much complexity will it add? adel (Nov 08)
- RE: Failover how much complexity will it add? Blake Pfankuch (Nov 08)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Adam Rothschild (Nov 08)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 08)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Joe Maimon (Nov 08)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Seth Mattinen (Nov 08)
- RE: Failover how much complexity will it add? John.Herbert (Nov 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? adel (Nov 08)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Seth Mattinen (Nov 08)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? adel (Nov 08)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Ken Gilmour (Nov 08)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Adam Armstrong (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Ken Gilmour (Nov 08)
- RE: Failover how much complexity will it add? Blake Pfankuch (Nov 08)
