nanog mailing list archives
RE: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
From: "George Bonser" <gbonser () seven com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:46:49 -0800
I believe the issue will become a moot point in the next 12 months when vendors begin to ship switches with TRILL. TRILL is basically a layer 2 routing protocol that will replace spanning tree. It will allow you to connect several uplinks, utilize all the bandwidth of the uplinks, prevent loops, and find the best path to the destination through the switch fabric. Think of it like OSPF for layer 2. It should be shipping within the next 6 to 9 months. -----Original Message----- From: Raj Singh [mailto:raj.singh () demandmedia com] Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 11:49 AM To: 'nanog () nanog org' Subject: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Guys, I am wondering how many of you are doing layer 3 to top of rack switches and what the pros and cons are. Also, if you are doing layer 3 to top of rack do you guys have any links to published white papers on it? Thanks, Raj Singh
Current thread:
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR, (continued)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Tore Anderson (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR gordon b slater (Nov 15)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Simon Leinen (Nov 15)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Matthew Walster (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Randy Bush (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Stefan (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR rodrick brown (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Joe Loiacono (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Cord MacLeod (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Shane Ronan (Nov 13)
