nanog mailing list archives
Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives
From: Leslie <leslie () craigslist org>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:20:19 -0800
Tore Anderson wrote:
* Gary MackenzieI had looked briefly, does anybody here actually use them as peering routers? I've seen a few implementations using them in the MPLS P andPE router roles but never as border routers.We've been using the MX-es as border routers for some time now. It's a role that suits them very well in my opinion, no problems at all so far. I'll be very surprised if we don't end up using MX-es in our next PoP as well. Best regards,
We're using them as border routers and love them. As long as you don't need sonet, i think it's a great choice.
Leslie
Current thread:
- Juniper M120 Alternatives Gary Mackenzie (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Dale W. Carder (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Chris Grundemann (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Gary Mackenzie (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives sthaug (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Tore Anderson (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Leslie (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Daniel Roesen (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Randy Bush (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Jack Bates (Nov 17)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 17)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Paul Cosgrove (Nov 18)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Phil Pierotti (Nov 18)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives sthaug (Nov 18)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Jack Bates (Nov 19)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Tony Varriale (Nov 18)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Chris Grundemann (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Dale W. Carder (Nov 16)
