nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT: VSS + MEC - port-channel dynamically cloned?
From: Ross Vandegrift <ross () kallisti us>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:57:20 -0500
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 07:51:29AM +0100, Leland Vandervort wrote:
Essentially, for all of the MEC connections, the VSS has created a clone of the configured port-channel to bind the actual physical connections, rather than binding them under the configured port-channel (and suffixed the port-channel number with A or B depending on which chassis was first to bind).
IOS does this when ethernet channel members cannot join the bundle due to negotiation mismatch. If the currently active elements are incompatible with a new element, the A/B interfaces are created. These are called "secondary aggregators" in IOS-speak. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094470.shtml#po1a -- Ross Vandegrift ross () kallisti us "If the fight gets hot, the songs get hotter. If the going gets tough, the songs get tougher." --Woody Guthrie
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Current thread:
- OT: VSS + MEC - port-channel dynamically cloned? Leland Vandervort (Nov 23)
- Re: OT: VSS + MEC - port-channel dynamically cloned? Ross Vandegrift (Nov 24)
- Re: OT: VSS + MEC - port-channel dynamically cloned? Leland Vandervort (Nov 24)
- Re: OT: VSS + MEC - port-channel dynamically cloned? Ross Vandegrift (Nov 24)
- Re: OT: VSS + MEC - port-channel dynamically cloned? Leland Vandervort (Nov 24)
- Re: OT: VSS + MEC - port-channel dynamically cloned? Ross Vandegrift (Nov 24)
