nanog mailing list archives

Re: Peering in Latin America


From: Ken Gilmour <ken.gilmour () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:30:46 -0600

2009/10/31 Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>:
Ken Gilmour wrote:

We have BGP4 networks in other locations (IPv4 and IPv6) - Costa Rica
being one of the places that don't have it... We would really like to
be able to implement it here but are finding it difficult to find SPs
who support Customers who advertise their own PI space.


It doesn't sound like you want peering - specifically AT&T's answer
implies they think you want settlement-free peering when you just want
to announce your routes via BGP (aka paid transit).

~Seth



Yes - Sorry my initial approach to NANOG was not very specific!
However my approach to the SPs was very specific (and ADN understood
exactly what I wanted when I first approached them and are working on
a quote)... I specifically asked how we would go about getting a
second point-to-point link and peer with them over that link (and for
existing providers such as ICE and RACSA) how we could upgrade our
current contract to allow us to announce our own PI space... I am not
sure how I could be any more specific than that...

Ken


Current thread: