nanog mailing list archives
Re: Minimum IPv6 size
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 19:02:40 -0700
Given that ARIN issues /48s to multihomed end users, I think it would be wise to accept them. Owen On Oct 2, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Since we're on the topic of what's commonly accepted in IPv4 land (a/24), what's the story in IPv6 land? It seems to me that a /32 is a fursure thing, but others will accept down to a /48, too. ~Seth
Current thread:
- Minimum IPv6 size Seth Mattinen (Oct 02)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Kevin Oberman (Oct 02)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size James Aldridge (Oct 03)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Leo Vegoda (Oct 03)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size James Aldridge (Oct 03)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Leo Bicknell (Oct 03)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Kevin Oberman (Oct 03)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Christian Seitz (Oct 03)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Kevin Oberman (Oct 03)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size James Aldridge (Oct 03)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Kevin Oberman (Oct 02)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Seth Mattinen (Oct 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Brandon Butterworth (Oct 03)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Brandon Butterworth (Oct 03)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Matthew Petach (Oct 03)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Leo Vegoda (Oct 04)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Kevin Oberman (Oct 04)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Leo Vegoda (Oct 05)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Matthew Petach (Oct 03)
