Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy

[Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>]

On 13/10/2009, at 5:46 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:

> I think he was pointing out that extra routes due to "slow start"
> policies should not be a factor in v6.  My guess is that is about
> half of the "extra" routes announced today, the other half being
> TE routes.


You can pretty easily figure out how many advertised prefixes are  
intentional de-aggregates, and you can get a fairly good idea as to  
how many of them are for TE as well I expect, by looking for different  
AS paths.

Someone mentioned some slides earlier in this thread by Vince Fuller  
at APRICOT early '07 that from memory have pretty good data on this.

--
Nathan Ward