nanog mailing list archives
Re: multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX
From: Philip Lavine <source_route () yahoo com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
More info if this helps:
Switch Platform:
4500 SUPII+
with gig line cards
Data rate is <100Mbps
Server OS: Windows 2003 R2 (please withhold snickering).
----- Original Message ----
From: Philip Lavine <source_route () yahoo com>
To: nanog <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Wed, October 14, 2009 8:19:51 AM
Subject: multicast nightmare #42
Please explain how this would be possible:
1 sender
1 mcast group
1 receiver
----------------
= no data loss
1 sender
1 mcast group
2+ receivers on same VLAN and physical segment
--------------------
= data loss
Current thread:
- multicast nightmare #42 Philip Lavine (Oct 14)
- RE: multicast nightmare #42 Forestal, Andre Jr. (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 Adrian Minta (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 Adrian Chadd (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX Philip Lavine (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX Adrian Minta (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX Benson Schliesser (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX Adrian Minta (Oct 14)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 Philip Lavine (Oct 15)
- RE: multicast nightmare #42 Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Oct 15)
- Message not available
