nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
From: Chuck Anderson <cra () WPI EDU>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 19:15:12 -0400
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 01:29:54PM -0400, TJ wrote:
You say hacks, others see it as relatively-speaking simple additions of more
functionality.
You can define any options you want for DHCPv6, write a draft and get
community support.
I don't see how that ("continuously evolving DHCPv6 hacks") is any better
than what is happening with RAs?
The difference is that I don't have to wait for my switch/router vendor to implement RA extensions, I can just implement it myself in an open source DHCPv6 server. Software that is embedded in hardware is very hard to get changed.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Nathan Ward (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 18)
- RE: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Nathan Ward (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Kevin Loch (Oct 18)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 18)
- RE: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 18)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 18)
- RE: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Kevin Loch (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Chuck Anderson (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Nick Hilliard (Oct 18)
- RE: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Matthew Kaufman (Oct 18)
- RE: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Mohacsi Janos (Oct 19)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN David Conrad (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Chris Adams (Oct 21)
