nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
From: Kevin Loch <kloch () kl net>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:20:05 -0400
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 18 okt 2009, at 10:03, Andy Davidson wrote:Support default-routing options for DHCPv6 !This would be a big mistake. Fate sharing between the device that advertises the presence of a router and the device that forwards packets makes RAs much more robust than DHCPv4. And DHCPv6 is just a case of very bad design, don't expect it to work well without bending over backwards even farther than you're used to with DHCPv4. It's time for this DHC stuff to reach its final resting place.
Then don't use it. That's why it's called an Option :) However some of us actually need to use this stuff and sometimes in ways not imagined by the IETF. - Kevin
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN ... anycast, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN ... anycast TJ (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN ... anycast Perry Lorier (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN ... anycast TJ (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN ... anycast Owen DeLong (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN ... anycast Chris Adams (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN ... anycast Perry Lorier (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Perry Lorier (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Kevin Loch (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Andy Davidson (Oct 28)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Randy Bush (Oct 28)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Matthew Moyle-Croft (Oct 28)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 28)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Mark Smith (Oct 29)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN trejrco (Oct 19)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ron Broersma (Oct 19)
