nanog mailing list archives

RE: legacy /8

From: Joe Johnson <joe () riversidecg com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 17:19:12 -0500

Owen DeLong wrote:

The amount of effort required to reclaim those few IPv4 addresses would
vastly exceed the return on that effort. Far better for that effort to be
directed towards the addition of IPv6 capabilities to existing IPv4
deployments so as to minimize the impact of IPv4 exhaustion.


Maybe encourage people like Apple, Xerox, HP or Ford to migrate their operations completely to IPv6 and return their /8?

j

Current thread:

Re: legacy /8, (continued)
- - - Re: legacy /8 Barry Shein (Apr 02)
    - Re: legacy /8 bmanning (Apr 02)
    - Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 02)
    - Re: legacy /8 bmanning (Apr 02)
    - Re: legacy /8 jim deleskie (Apr 02)
    - Re: legacy /8 Robert Brockway (Apr 03)
    - Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 03)
    - Re: legacy /8 Larry Sheldon (Apr 02)
    - Re: legacy /8 Michael Thomas (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Owen DeLong (Apr 02)
  - RE: legacy /8 Joe Johnson (Apr 02)
    - Re: legacy /8 Majdi S. Abbas (Apr 02)
    - RE: legacy /8 Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 02)
  - Re: legacy /8 bmanning (Apr 02)
    - Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 02)
    - Re: legacy /8 Jim Burwell (Apr 02)
    - RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 02)
    - Re: legacy /8 jim deleskie (Apr 02)
    - Re: legacy /8 John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Apr 02)
    - RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 02)
    - RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 02)

(Thread continues...)