Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

[Steven Bellovin <smb () cs columbia edu>]

On Apr 19, 2010, at 1:22 31PM, Bryan Fields wrote:

> On 4/19/2010 10:14, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
> > The eyeball ISPs will find it trivial to NAT should they ever need to do
> > so however, something servers cannot do - you are looking at numbers,
> > not operational considerations.
>
> LSN is not trivial.

Also remember the abuse/blacklist/CALEA problem with NAT -- you have to log every connection by port number, and hope 
that the complaints you get mention source port.


                --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb