nanog mailing list archives
Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done?
From: John Levine <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 28 Apr 2010 01:46:57 -0000
Hmm. A macro expansion for a /48 would mean 1,208,925,819,614,629,174,706,176 leaves. An interesting stress test for name servers... :-).
My inclination would be to use a wildcard that returns something like not-in-service.some-network.net, and let the clients add records for the addresses they use. For spoof resistance, how about doing a forward lookup on the purported name and only installing it if it gets a matching AAAA record? R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done?, (continued)
- Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? Richard Barnes (Apr 27)
- Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? Larry Sheldon (Apr 27)
- Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? Larry Sheldon (Apr 27)
- Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? Tony Finch (Apr 28)
- Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? Larry Sheldon (Apr 28)
- Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? David Conrad (Apr 27)
- Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold (Apr 27)
- Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? David Conrad (Apr 27)
- Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? Richard Barnes (Apr 27)
- Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? Steve Bertrand (Apr 27)
- Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? John Levine (Apr 27)
- Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? David Conrad (Apr 27)
- Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin (Apr 27)
- Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? Jack Bates (Apr 28)
- RE: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? Mark Scholten (Apr 28)
- Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? Stefan Schmidt (Apr 28)
- Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? Mark Andrews (Apr 27)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done? Stefan Schmidt (Apr 28)
