nanog mailing list archives
Re: Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ?
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 09:45:44 -0500
On 4/4/2010 05:00, IPv3.com wrote:
Based on these ASCII notes...(c. 1995 cave paintings)... http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1775.txt Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ? http://www.porticus.org/bell/telephones-picturephone.html Is a 2010 HDTV (ATSC DLNA) viewer - "On the Internet" ? Note for IPv6 archeologists...Mobile Digital TV went with IPv4+Shim http://www.atsc.org Funding of the so-called Eco-System (aka Idle Rich Society) also appears to define "The Internet" in some circles. It appears 100+ people live off of Internet Fees for doing largely nothing. They of course travel to explain why that structure is essential. Is it ?
Are you sure you are on the right platform--sounds more like I would expect to hear in Amherst or Sproul hall. Or did you just forget to mention your point? To answer the question in the Subject: (the last time anything made sense to me in that message): No. It was an experiment in the PANS branch of POTS (PSTN to some people). -- Democracy: Three wolves and a sheep voting on the dinner menu. Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
Current thread:
- Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ? IPv3.com (Apr 04)
- Re: Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ? Larry Sheldon (Apr 04)
- Re: Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ? John Sage (Apr 04)
- Re: Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ? Larry Sheldon (Apr 04)
- Re: Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ? John Sage (Apr 04)
- Re: Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ? Michael Dillon (Apr 04)
- Re: Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ? Larry Sheldon (Apr 04)
