nanog mailing list archives

Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 09:30:08 -0700

Put differently, you work in this arena too...  you've presumably
talked to stakeholders.  Can you list some of the reasons people have
provided for not adopting v6, and are any of them related to the v6
policies regarding address space?

Reasons:
        +       Fear
                People simply fear deploying new technology to their environment.

        +       Uncertainty
                The future is uncertain. Many people fail to realize that IPv4's future
                is even more uncertain than that of IPv6.

        +       Doubt
                You are not the only one expressing doubt in IPv6.  The reality,
                however, is that I think that LSN and a multi-layer NAT internet
                are even more worthy of doubt than IPv6.

        +       Inertia
                Many people are approaching this like driving at night with the
                headlights off.  They refuse to alter course until they can see
                the wall.  There is a wall coming in two years whether you can
                see it or not. If you have not begun to deploy IPv6 (changed
                course), then there will soon come a point where the accident
                has already occurred, even though you cannot yet see the
                wall and have not yet made physical contact with it.

                A classic example of this phenomenon would be a certain
                large unsinkable ship where the captain chose to try and
                make better time to New York rather than use a lower speed
                to have time to avoid ice bergs. The ship never arrived in
                New York and its name became an adjective to describe
                large disasters.

Owen

        


Current thread: