nanog mailing list archives
RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
From: "Jim Templin" <jimtempl () att net>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:38:33 -0700
-----Original Message----- From: Warren Bailey [mailto:wbailey () gci com] Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 12:31 PM To: Jeroen van Aart; nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Are we to believe that filtering .cn will filter all Chinese attacks? I know that if I was up to no good in China, I'd buy a cheap VSAT connection, tld's are probably not a good way to identify bad guys. My two cents.. //warren -------------------------- As was pointed out that might have been the point of hijacking IP space from outside cn.net. -Jim
Current thread:
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?, (continued)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jeroen van Aart (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Benjamin Billon (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jeroen van Aart (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Benjamin Billon (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jim Burwell (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Patrick Giagnocavo (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jeroen van Aart (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Rich Kulawiec (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jeroen van Aart (Apr 09)
- RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Warren Bailey (Apr 09)
- RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jim Templin (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 08)
