nanog mailing list archives
Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:27:50 +0000
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:23:02PM +0100, Michael Dillon wrote:
Shall I go on? Regardless of what you may think about whether those injured folks should be entitled to the information, the fact is that they are entitled to it under ARIN policy developed based on public consensus. Which means you injure them by denying it.Enough with the amateur lawyering! A minor inconvenience is NOT injury under the law.
Pot, Kettle, Black.
Thanks for that legal advice Michael.
--bill
Current thread:
- Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources, (continued)
- Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 05)
- Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources William Herrin (Aug 05)
- Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 05)
- Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources William Herrin (Aug 05)
- Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 05)
- Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources William Herrin (Aug 05)
- Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 05)
- Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources William Herrin (Aug 05)
- Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources Michael Dillon (Aug 14)
- Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources bmanning (Aug 14)
- Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources ML (Aug 05)
- Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources William Herrin (Aug 05)
- Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources Christopher Morrow (Aug 03)
