nanog mailing list archives
(cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there?
From: George Michaelson <ggm () apnic net>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:38:01 +1000
I have been looking at acl management s/w in the freecode space and I can find lots of tools which manage/distribute
and test ACLs in routers.
I'm wondering if anyone has written a parser which can construct rule-trees and get rid of the cruft, unusable,
order-misorder and other issues in a large ACL pool?
Its possible this is NP in the wider sense, but even a partial improvement would be useful
something which can take a couple of hundred basic and extended ACLs and tell you
these <ten> don't work
these <twenty> conflict
the remaining <x> have a sequence and can reduce to this basic <x-y> set
(we've got the usual "acquisition of rule by accretion" problem across 4 edge/core routers with a mix of public facing,
internal, WiFi, guest rules, and I hate to think this is either start from scratch, or intractable. The evidence is
that its FRAGILE)
-G
Current thread:
- (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? George Michaelson (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Dobbins, Roland (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Christopher Morrow (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Randy Bush (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? George Michaelson (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Randy Bush (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? George Michaelson (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? George Michaelson (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Dobbins, Roland (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Cat Okita (Aug 19)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Christopher Morrow (Aug 19)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Cat Okita (Aug 19)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Christopher Morrow (Aug 19)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Christopher Morrow (Aug 19)
