nanog mailing list archives
Re: Did your BGP crash today?
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 09:58:48 -0700
On 8/29/10 9:31 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> writes:Just out of curiosity, at what point will we as operators rise up against the ivory tower protocol designers at the IETF and demand that they add a mechanism to not bring down the entire BGP session because of a single malformed attribute? Did I miss the memo about the meeting?I guess you did. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-optional-transitive-02
rfc 4893 (4 octet as numbers) leverages the assumption that you can send the as4_path attribute and that even router's that don't understand it will forward it. given that 4 byte as numbers exist in the internet and many non-4byte aware routers exist, that seems like a reasonable assumption.
Bjørn
Current thread:
- Re: Did your BGP crash today?, (continued)
- Re: Did your BGP crash today? Clay Fiske (Aug 27)
- Re: Did your BGP crash today? Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 27)
- Re: Did your BGP crash today? Claudio Jeker (Aug 27)
- Re: Did your BGP crash today? Clay Fiske (Aug 27)
- Re: Did your BGP crash today? Paul Ferguson (Aug 27)
- Re: Did your BGP crash today? Chris Adams (Aug 27)
- Re: Did your BGP crash today? Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 27)
- Re: Did your BGP crash today? Jeffrey S. Young (Aug 27)
- Re: Did your BGP crash today? Randy Bush (Aug 27)
- Re: Did your BGP crash today? Bjørn Mork (Aug 29)
- Re: Did your BGP crash today? Joel Jaeggli (Aug 29)
- Re: Did your BGP crash today? Grzegorz Janoszka (Aug 27)
- Re: Did your BGP crash today? Thomas Mangin (Aug 27)
- Re: Did your BGP crash today? Grzegorz Janoszka (Aug 27)
- Re: Did your BGP crash today? Thomas Mangin (Aug 27)
