nanog mailing list archives
RE: Want to move to all 208V for server racks
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () corp nac net>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:12:47 -0500
On 12/2/10 9:20 AM, Mark Kent wrote:"Why do we install 120v instead of 208v?" was asked over a year ago either here or on cisco-nsp. It generated a long discussion, but it should have been cut short as early in the thread someone said all that had to be said: "because we are idiots."This one? http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2009-05/msg00649.html ~Seth
No, this one. I knew it sounded familiar, it was me. http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2009-05/msg00650.html
Current thread:
- Re: Want to move to all 208V for server racks, (continued)
- Re: Want to move to all 208V for server racks Kevin Stange (Dec 02)
- Re: Want to move to all 208V for server racks Christopher Phillips (Dec 02)
- Re: Want to move to all 208V for server racks William Pitcock (Dec 02)
- Re: Want to move to all 208V for server racks Gary Buhrmaster (Dec 03)
- RE: Want to move to all 208V for server racks Alex Rubenstein (Dec 03)
- RE: Want to move to all 208V for server racks David Hubbard (Dec 02)
- Re: Want to move to all 208V for server racks Jay Nakamura (Dec 02)
- Re: Want to move to all 208V for server racks Mark Kent (Dec 02)
- Re: Want to move to all 208V for server racks Ingo Flaschberger (Dec 02)
- Re: Want to move to all 208V for server racks Seth Mattinen (Dec 02)
- RE: Want to move to all 208V for server racks Alex Rubenstein (Dec 02)
- Re: Want to move to all 208V for server racks Robert Bonomi (Dec 04)
