nanog mailing list archives
Re: ARIN space not accepted
From: Steven Bellovin <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 14:19:15 -0500
On Dec 4, 2010, at 1:43 09AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt eduFrom: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt eduDate: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 20:00:15 -0500 On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:24:16 PST, Leo Bicknell said:It is speculated that no later than Q1, two more /8's will be allocated, triggering a policy that will give the remaining 5 /8's out to the RIR's. That means, prior to end of Q1, the bogon list will be: 0/8 10/8 127/8 172.16/12 192.168/16 224/3Oh. And don't forget to do *bidirectional* filtering of these addresses. ;)Ahh, not quite. Blocking 224/3 bi-directionally might cause a few issues if you accept multicast traffic from anyone.
Bidirectional blocking of traffic with source addresses in 224/3 -- that should never happen unless I badly
misunderstand multicast.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Current thread:
- ARIN space not accepted Dustin Swinford (Dec 03)
- Re: ARIN space not accepted Joel Jaeggli (Dec 03)
- Re: ARIN space not accepted Jack Bates (Dec 03)
- Re: ARIN space not accepted Michael Thomas (Dec 03)
- Re: ARIN space not accepted Leo Bicknell (Dec 03)
- Re: ARIN space not accepted Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 03)
- Re: ARIN space not accepted Kevin Oberman (Dec 03)
- Re: ARIN space not accepted Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 06)
- Re: ARIN space not accepted Jeroen van Aart (Dec 06)
- Re: ARIN space not accepted Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 07)
- Re: ARIN space not accepted Steven Bellovin (Dec 07)
