nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamhaus...
From: Matthias Leisi <matthias () leisi net>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:15:36 +0100
Am 21.02.10 10:25, schrieb Michelle Sullivan:
As a matter of interest, who are the other current DNSBL's to do it?
dnswl.org currently does not do it, but bandwidth suckers are a pain. The work is considerable: log aggregation, log review, trying to find a responsible for the IPs and following up until they finally implement a local copy. We losely define 100k queries/24h to be acceptable. Above that, you should set up your local (private) mirror (and hey, rsync is free!). And there are some entities that do not even acknowledge that a problem exists -- most likely until you turn access off for them. Yes, I can completely understand Spamhaus & Co for limiting access to their public mirrors. (OTOH, blocking access to these abusers is hard since our infrastructure partly relies on donated, shared public DNSBL mirrors.) -- Matthias
Current thread:
- Re: Spamhaus..., (continued)
- Re: Spamhaus... James Hess (Feb 20)
- Re: Spamhaus... John Levine (Feb 20)
- Re: Spamhaus... Graeme Fowler (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Jon Lewis (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Tony Finch (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Jon Lewis (Feb 21)
- Re: DNSBLs other than Spamhaus... John Levine (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Larry Sheldon (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Matthias Leisi (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Larry Sheldon (Feb 20)
- Re: blowback, was Spamhaus... John Levine (Feb 20)
