
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 10:08:35 +0530
While not at all touching the accuracy of knujon's stats with a bargepole, it would be interesting if some process were developed to deaccredit or otherwise kill off the shell registrars .. and the bogus LIRs (which is how the thread started). On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner () nic-naa net> wrote:
[1] shell registrars exist for another exploit, to maximize race contention results for the VGRS drop pool, the acquisition of expired names which have "name" value or residual traffic monitization value. Four companies control 318 US domiciled ICANN accreditations: eNom (116), Directi/PDR (47), Dotster (51), and Snapnames (104). Source: http://www.knujon.com/registrars/
-- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 02)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Eric Brunner-Williams (Jan 03)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 03)
- Re: Article on spammers and their infrastructure Eric Brunner-Williams (Jan 03)