nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection
From: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa () latt net>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 17:12:14 -0700
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 07:32:48PM -0400, Scott Berkman wrote:
I really wouldn't use the word legacy to describe SONET and OC-3's.
It's around 25 years old (work started in 1985, first standards
published in 1988) and we now have a ratified 100G Ethernet standard.
Much of it is being used to transport subrate links, some of
which are derived from even older transport standards.
If not legacy, what word WOULD you use?
--msa
Current thread:
- Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Alan Bryant (Jul 03)
- Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Seth Mattinen (Jul 03)
- Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Mike (Jul 03)
- Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Seth Mattinen (Jul 03)
- Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Alan Bryant (Jul 03)
- Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Christopher Young (Jul 03)
- Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Mike (Jul 03)
- RE: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Scott Berkman (Jul 03)
- Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Majdi S. Abbas (Jul 03)
- Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Seth Mattinen (Jul 03)
- Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Alan Bryant (Jul 03)
- Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Chris Gotstein (Jul 03)
- RE: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Ray Burkholder (Jul 03)
- Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Chris Gotstein (Jul 03)
- Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Randy Bush (Jul 03)
- Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Matthew Palmer (Jul 03)
- Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Randy Bush (Jul 03)
- Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection Larry Sheldon (Jul 03)
- Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection joel jaeggli (Jul 06)
