nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers
From: Joe Greco <jgreco () ns sol net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:21:21 -0500 (CDT)
On Jun 9, 2010, at 4:27 AM, Joe Greco wrote:I'm all for that, but, point is that people who fail to meet that standard are currently getting a free ride. IMHO, they should pay and they should have the recourse of being (at least partially) reimbursed by their at-fault software vendors for contributory negligence.Great idea. You know, I've got a great solution for global warming. Let's hold all the car owners accountable for all the greenhouse gases their cars belch out, and let them have the recourse of being (at least partially) reimbursed by their at-fault car manufacturers and gasoline distributors for contributory negligence.1. My car emits very little greenhouse gas, so, I'm cool with that. Sounds great to me. (I drive a Prius).
Your car emits lots of greenhouse gases. Just because it's /less/ doesn't change the fact that the Prius has an ICE. We have a Prius and a HiHy too.
2. Manufacturers are held liable for contributory negligence when the
design of their vehicle is unsafe and causes an accident.
That isn't relevant to what I suggested.
3. We're not talking about greenhouse gasses here... We're talking
about car-wrecks on the information superhighway caused by
a combination of irresponsible operators and poor vehicle design.
That wasn't the analogy I was making. I was stabbing at the whole idea behind your suggestion, by directly translating it to a real-world example.
See how insane that sounds?Actually, it sounds reasonably sane to me, but, it's not a good analogy as noted above, so, the relative merits are mostly irrelevant. Owen
-- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN) With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
Current thread:
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers, (continued)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Brielle Bruns (Jun 08)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers J. Oquendo (Jun 08)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Larry Sheldon (Jun 08)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Paul Ferguson (Jun 08)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Owen DeLong (Jun 08)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Larry Sheldon (Jun 08)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Owen DeLong (Jun 08)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Joe Greco (Jun 09)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Gregory Edigarov (Jun 09)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Owen DeLong (Jun 09)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Joe Greco (Jun 09)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Larry Sheldon (Jun 09)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Alexander Harrowell (Jun 10)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Brielle Bruns (Jun 08)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Steven Bellovin (Jun 08)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 08)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Paul Ferguson (Jun 08)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Mark (Jun 08)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 09)
- Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers Owen DeLong (Jun 08)
