nanog mailing list archives

Re: IP4 Space


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:24:15 -0500

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:15 PM, David Conrad <drc () virtualized org> wrote:
On Mar 4, 2010, at 2:30 PM, William Herrin wrote:
Because we expect far fewer end users to multihome tomorrow than do today?

We do?

Why do we expect this?

David,

Well, I don't know that "we" do, but Joel made a remarkable assertion
that non-aggregable assignments to end users, the ones still needed
for multihoming, would go down under IPv6. I wondered about his
reasoning. Stan then offered the surprising clarification that a
reduction in the use of NAT would naturally result in a reduction of
multihoming.

Regards,
Bill

-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


Current thread: