nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP4 Space
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:24:15 -0500
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:15 PM, David Conrad <drc () virtualized org> wrote:
On Mar 4, 2010, at 2:30 PM, William Herrin wrote:Because we expect far fewer end users to multihome tomorrow than do today?We do? Why do we expect this?
David, Well, I don't know that "we" do, but Joel made a remarkable assertion that non-aggregable assignments to end users, the ones still needed for multihoming, would go down under IPv6. I wondered about his reasoning. Stan then offered the surprising clarification that a reduction in the use of NAT would naturally result in a reduction of multihoming. Regards, Bill -- William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
Current thread:
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie, (continued)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Mark Newton (Mar 07)
- Re: IP4 Space Marco Hogewoning (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Joel Jaeggli (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Stan Barber (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Steve Bertrand (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Steve Bertrand (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Stan Barber (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space David Conrad (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Christopher Morrow (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Joel Jaeggli (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 05)
- NANOG job board James Jones (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space David Conrad (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Joel Jaeggli (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Stan Barber (Mar 18)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 18)
- Re: IP4 Space Stan Barber (Mar 18)
- Re: IP4 Space Christopher Morrow (Mar 18)
