nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP4 Space
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:18:17 -0700
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault () viagenie ca> wrote:
On 2010-03-22 17:42, Christopher Morrow wrote:the current ietf draft for 'simple cpe security' (draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09.txt) is potentially calling for some measures like nat, not nat today but...This is being reversed as we speak.
yup, the 'simple' part of that proposal didn't stay 'simple'.. it's
looking to get more simple (simple again?) but, my point was there are
efforts to provide a not-wide-open-network for v6 deployments at the
residential-cpe end.
I think the goal of the author(s) intend to provide as much freedom as
possible, but wanted a base level of security for the end users, so we
dont re-learn 'lookie i have a dsl! Doh! i got pwned :(' again.
-Chris
Current thread:
- NANOG job board, (continued)
- NANOG job board James Jones (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space David Conrad (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Joel Jaeggli (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Stan Barber (Mar 18)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 18)
- Re: IP4 Space Stan Barber (Mar 18)
- Re: IP4 Space Christopher Morrow (Mar 18)
- Re: IP4 Space Stan Barber (Mar 22)
- Re: IP4 Space Christopher Morrow (Mar 22)
- Re: IP4 Space Simon Perreault (Mar 22)
- Re: IP4 Space Christopher Morrow (Mar 22)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 22)
- Re: IP4 Space Daniel Senie (Mar 22)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 22)
- Re: IP4 Space Mark Newton (Mar 22)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 23)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 23)
- Re: IP4 Space Tim Durack (Mar 23)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 23)
- Re: IP4 Space Christopher Morrow (Mar 23)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 23)
