nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP and convergence time
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 20:45:42 -0500
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 09:52:48AM -0600, Danny McPherson wrote:
The holdtime isn't technically negotiated, both sides convey their value in the open message and the lower of the two is used by both BGP speakers. IIRC, neither J or C reset the session with the timer change, but the new holdtimer expiry value doesn't take effect until then.
Rest assured J will always reset the session if given given half a chance, and changing your holdtime is more than half. :) One thing I find interesting is that most other protocols will err on the side of caution and use the higher of two values like this when negotiating between two parties, but BGP does the opposite. I still run into bad bgp implementations which can't keep up with my 30 sec hold timers all the time *coughghettoequinixrouteservercough*. -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
Current thread:
- Re: BGP and convergence time, (continued)
- Re: BGP and convergence time Randy Bush (May 11)
- Re: BGP and convergence time Jay Nakamura (May 11)
- Re: BGP and convergence time Richard A Steenbergen (May 11)
- Re: BGP and convergence time Jay Nakamura (May 11)
- RE: BGP and convergence time Frank Bulk (May 13)
- Re: BGP and convergence time shake righa (May 14)
- Re: BGP and convergence time shake righa (May 14)
- Re: BGP and convergence time shake righa (May 14)
- Re: BGP and convergence time Scott Weeks (May 11)
- Re: BGP and convergence time Matthew Walster (May 12)
- Re: BGP and convergence time Jay Nakamura (May 12)
- Re: BGP and convergence time Danny McPherson (May 12)
- Re: BGP and convergence time Richard A Steenbergen (May 12)
- Re: BGP and convergence time Matthew Walster (May 12)
- Re: BGP and convergence time Randy Bush (May 11)
- Re: BGP and convergence time Joel Jaeggli (May 19)
