nanog mailing list archives
Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 23:30:14 -0400
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Brielle Bruns <bruns () 2mbit com> wrote:
<rant> Just an observation, but I'm fairly sure that I'm not the only one who feels that those with rather high budgets tend to forget that not everyone has the luxury of a virtual blank check. </rant>
awesome, take an old 2800 or 2500, plug in a t1 to one of the providers listed (twt seems like a great choice, or atlantech, who I think also does v6 and seems to offer 300$/mon t1's regularly), run v6 ONLY on that, take the 10/100m ether out the back and v6-up the rest of your network. See, done for 300$/month... the reason I said 'find a provider that does do native v6, terminate there and tunnel or spread-out internally from there' was exactly because spending 'tens of thousands of dollars' right off the bat was probably hard to justify. thanks though. -chris
Current thread:
- RE: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection, (continued)
- RE: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Eric Van Tol (May 17)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Christopher Morrow (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Karl Auer (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection bmanning (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Owen DeLong (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Brielle Bruns (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jared Mauch (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Merike Kaeo (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Owen DeLong (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Brielle Bruns (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Christopher Morrow (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Nick Hilliard (May 15)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jared Mauch (May 14)
