nanog mailing list archives
Re: Juniper SRX-210 -- CCC certificate required
From: Elmar K. Bins <elmi () 4ever de>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 10:52:48 +0200
Re Gordon, gordslater () ieee org (gordon b slater) wrote:
...something in the back of my head says they retracted from their initial stance recently (few month ago?) and said the CCC for IT security kit was only needed for Gov't Procurement kit - I could be very wrong, it was a snippet of casual conversation in passing.
Thank you for this side note already - I'll forward your thoughts, maybe it helps. Still, if anyone can dig something up...
Maybe you're just up against extra red tape, officials not up to speed etc; or maybe it is for a Govt Contract after all.
It's not for a government contract (it's for the renewal of the
".de" ccTLD DNS setup in Beijing), and they could have put the
red tape around other stuff that's in there. I guess it's just
the usual formalism.
Unfortunately, Google doesn't come up with anything about SRX's
and CCC certification, though there seems to be a version with
chinese plugsets...
Yours,
Elmar.
--
"Machen Sie sich erst einmal unbeliebt. Dann werden Sie auch ernstgenommen."
(Konrad Adenauer)
--------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---
Current thread:
- Juniper SRX-210 -- CCC certificate required Elmar K. Bins (May 18)
- Re: Juniper SRX-210 -- CCC certificate required gordon b slater (May 18)
- Re: Juniper SRX-210 -- CCC certificate required Elmar K . Bins (May 18)
- Re: Juniper SRX-210 -- CCC certificate required Lala Lander (May 18)
- Re: Juniper SRX-210 -- CCC certificate required Elmar K. Bins (May 18)
- Re: Juniper SRX-210 -- CCC certificate required Elmar K . Bins (May 18)
- Re: Juniper SRX-210 -- CCC certificate required gordon b slater (May 18)
