nanog mailing list archives

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 JunOS Recommendation


From: "GIULIANO (UOL)" <giulianocm () uol com br>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:41:07 -0200

We are running 10.2R3 for 10 x EX4200.

Everything is working fine ... from VC to BGP and virtual routers.




On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>wrote:

On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:43:55AM -0800, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
Hi Keegan,

I always try to go with


https://www.juniper.net/customers/csc/software/junos_software_versions.jsp

Based on past experience, I find this list to be a giant load of horse
shit. You'd have better luck picking good versions of code with a magic
8ball.


hahahahah  For one, I don't think I would have taken that quite as seriously
coming from anyone else.  Secondly I'm new here, but it's better than NANOG.


Unfortunately I can't tell you specifically what works best for
L2 on EX4200 because we use none of the first and very little of the
second, but I can give you a very very long list of reasons why 10.2R3
is (at this exact moment) the best choice for EX8200 doing routing.


We use the big cats for this but this may help someone I know.  Thanks.


--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)



_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp () puck nether net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp




Current thread: