nanog mailing list archives
Re: wikileaks unreachable
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:59:06 -0500
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 06:27:13PM -0500, James Jones wrote:
Remember not everyone who is on this list is a network operator and sometimes their misguided statements make it here.
It is an operations list; stick to the topic [reachabinility and
the fragmentation of dns or bgp data in this case] or don't post.
It doesn't require expert knowledge to stay even remotely on-topic.
--
RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- Re: wikileaks unreachable, (continued)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Joel Esler (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Ben McGinnes (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Zaid Ali (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Mark Hofman (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Andrew Kirch (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable James Jones (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Joe Provo (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Marshall Eubanks (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Ingo Flaschberger (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Andrew Kirch (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Ken Chase (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable James Jones (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Adrian Chadd (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Andrew Kirch (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Wil Schultz (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Ken Chase (Nov 30)