nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:37:39 +0000
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:21:36AM -0700, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:54 AM, <bmanning () vacation karoshi com> wrote:On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 09:42:50AM -0700, Cameron Byrne wrote:On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:20 PM, George Bonser <gbonser () seven com> wrote:-----Original Message----- From: Christopher Morrow > Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 9:49 PM To: bmanning Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05(now I'm teasing.. .Bill where's your docs on this fantastic new teknowlogie?)I found it here: http://www.ivi2.org/ But the readme is a bit confusing: http://www.ivi2.org/code/00-ivi0.5-README Trying to figure out how they map a /70 v6 prefix to a /30 v4 prefix assuming the mapping is to be 1-1Right, 1 to 1 does not solve any IPv4 exhaustion problems.ah... but the trick is to only need enough IPv4 in the pool to dynamically talk to the Internet. Native v6 to Native v6 never has to drop back to the Internet, It uses native v6 paths. So the larger the v6 uptake, the fewer Internet addreses you'll need to keep around in your pool.Going back to the title of the thread, IVI does not help you sunset IPv4 since the same amount of IPv4 is required.See above.So works, just not at a large scale. For larger scale, you need address sharing like NAT64.
depends on your definition of "large" scale.
for cernet2 ---
"The grid over IPv6 covers 20 universities distributed in 13 cities, and
the aggregation capability is high above 15 trillion time/sec, and the
storage capability above 150TB."
"CNGI-CERNET2 backbone runs IPv6 protocol and connects 25 PoPs distributed
in 20 cities in China with the speed of 2.5Gbps/10Gbps. Meanwhile, the transmission
rate of Beijing-Wuhan-Guangzhou and Wuhan-Nanjing-Shanghai is 10Gbps. Each
PoP provides the 1Gbps/2.5Gbps/10Gbps access capacity for the access network.
"Since the opening in 2004, CNGI-CERNET2 backbone has connected more than 200
IPv6 access networks of universities and R&D institutes in China, supported
technical trials and application demonstration, and provided excellent environment
for world-wide next generation Internet research."
So, yeah... for these smaller, regional networks, its a good fit. For you big
guys, you may need something else.
--bill
Current thread:
- Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05, (continued)
- Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05 bmanning (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05 Marshall Eubanks (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05 Christopher Morrow (Oct 21)
- RE: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05 George Bonser (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05 Cameron Byrne (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05 Barry Shein (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05 bmanning (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05 Barry Shein (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05 bmanning (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05 Cameron Byrne (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05 bmanning (Oct 22)
- RE: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05 George Bonser (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05 bmanning (Oct 22)
- RE: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05 George Bonser (Oct 22)
- RE: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA George Bonser (Oct 21)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA Matthew Petach (Oct 21)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA Joe Maimon (Oct 21)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA Owen DeLong (Oct 21)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA Dan White (Oct 21)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA Matthew Petach (Oct 22)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA Joe Maimon (Oct 22)
