nanog mailing list archives
Re: ILNP and DNS (from 2010.10.04 NANOG50 day 1 morning notes)
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:52:49 -0400
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Tony Finch <dot () dotat at> wrote:
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Michael Sinatra wrote:Hence the question: How should I provision authoritative DNS servers, given that the prefix information is provided via DNS--including the prefix information for the DNS servers themselves--leading to a chicken-and-egg problem. In addition, I would assume that I need something similar to glue records (instead of A or AAAA glue, I need L64 or LP glue).Isn't glue the answer to your question? Your name servers get their prefixes from the networks they are connected to, and they do dynamic
If i have my NS in my network, which is 'ILNP enabled' (if there would be such a thing), I think Michael's question is ... how do I tell DNS where my NS is if my NS is moving and doesn't have a single long-lived stable address ? Some of the answer may be: "Don't do that!", or "plan your moves properly, follow rfcXXXX which shows steps and timing to migrate an NS device/pair/set from network attachment point to network attachment point". -chris
Current thread:
- ILNP and DNS (from 2010.10.04 NANOG50 day 1 morning notes) Michael Sinatra (Oct 05)
- Re: ILNP and DNS (from 2010.10.04 NANOG50 day 1 morning notes) Tony Finch (Oct 05)
- Re: ILNP and DNS (from 2010.10.04 NANOG50 day 1 morning notes) Christopher Morrow (Oct 05)
- Re: ILNP and DNS (from 2010.10.04 NANOG50 day 1 morning notes) Michael Sinatra (Oct 05)
- Re: ILNP and DNS (from 2010.10.04 NANOG50 day 1 morning notes) Jack Bates (Oct 05)
- Re: ILNP and DNS (from 2010.10.04 NANOG50 day 1 morning notes) Christopher Morrow (Oct 05)
- Re: ILNP and DNS (from 2010.10.04 NANOG50 day 1 morning notes) Michael Sinatra (Oct 05)
- Re: ILNP and DNS (from 2010.10.04 NANOG50 day 1 morning notes) Tony Finch (Oct 05)
- Re: ILNP and DNS (from 2010.10.04 NANOG50 day 1 morning notes) Tony Finch (Oct 05)
